AI & Art Buying: Use the tool, keep the taste human
- Michele Colonna

- Sep 27
- 2 min read
Inspired by Artsy, Olivia Gavoyannis (Sep 15, 2025), our take for the Colonna Contemporary community/collectors.
Artificial intelligence is now part of every collector’s inbox, and yes, it’s fast. Ask a question and AI can surface artist bios, press, auction results, and rough price corridors in seconds. That speed is useful. But buying well still depends on human judgment: matching the exact series / date / size / material, reading the surface in person, and negotiating access to the right work, often the scarce work you actually want.

Where AI shines (use it!):
Speed & breadth. Rapid first pass on an artist’s career, shows, and ballpark pricing.
Filter by budget. If you’re at or under a threshold (say, $10k), AI can help you avoid markets that are clearly out of range.
Language prompts. Struggling to describe why Caravaggio hits for you? AI can help put words to “moody chiaroscuro, figurative intensity, clean surfaces”—handy for refining your search.
Where AI stumbles (watch-outs):
Bad comps. It mixes apples and oranges, small works on paper vs. museum-level canvases—then averages the price. That’s noise, not guidance.
Outdated bits. Sold inventory marked as “available,” old ranges, former gallery contacts—facts that were once true but aren’t now.
No access, no diplomacy. AI doesn’t get you the call, the preview, or the blessing from an artist’s studio. Relationships do.
Condition & fit. Screens don’t show craquelure, cockling, or how a piece breathes in your room (or a digital work on your display).
Our workflow at Colonna Contemporary (simple and calm):
Start broad with AI. Gather names you’re excited about.
Bring a shortlist to us. We verify like-for-like comps (series/date/size/material), provenance/documents, and condition risks.
Plan the fit. Scale, installation, and framing (or display specs for digital) so it lives beautifully at home.
Access & negotiation. We make the calls, request backroom options, and keep the tone professional and low-drama.
Practical example:You find a major-looking painting and see online “prices from $7k–$88k.” Without context, that range feels comforting, but it may be anchored to smaller, uncharacteristic works, not the specific series/scale you want. A better read compares only the right cohort: same series, similar year, similar size, same materials, similar exhibition weight. You’ll usually land in a defensible corridor, and you can decide whether to pay above for rarity or provenance.
How to get value from AI without getting burned:
Add time stamps to anything you save: As of Sep 2025.
Ask for like-for-like: “Compare only to works in the [series], circa [years], around [size], in [material].”
Use AI to draft emails; use humans to send them. Tone and relationships matter.
Keep a 1-page checklist on your phone (price, provenance, condition, fit) and run every listing through it in 90 seconds.
Our promise: We’ll use the tool, but keep the taste human, so you buy the thesis, not the hype.
CTA
Want the simple plan? Reply “MAP” and I’ll send the 1-page Main Line Collector’s Guide.
Considering a listing (fair, marketplace, another gallery, or ours)? Try our Second-Opinion Concierge for a quiet, unbiased read on price, provenance, condition, and fit, 48-hour reply.
Credit: Artsy, “pros/cons of AI for art buyers,” Olivia Gavoyannis (Sep 15, 2025).



Comments